Search for: "CHARALAMBOUS v. CHARALAMBOUS" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 3:28 am by Joel R. Brandes
[Cyprus] [Grave Risk of Harm] Charalambous v Charalambous, 744 F.Supp.2d 375 (D. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:01 pm by David Smith
Charalambous & Anor v Maureen Rosairie Ng & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 1604 The Court of Appeal has again thrown the cat among the tenancy deposit protection pigeons. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 10:21 pm
Comments On the disrepair claim, this is another data point suggesting that the Courts are open to arguments for damages based on percentage of rent following English Churches v Shine and Earle v Charalambous, rather than the Wallace scale, as I have suggested before. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm by David Smith
I am thinking here of Spencer v Taylor (which we analysed here), Charalambous v Ng, and now Edwards v Kumarasamy. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 12:07 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
So I read with interest Tessa’s piece on the recent case law of Charalambous v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
Hunt & Ors v Optima (Cambridge) Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 681 (TCC)This is a brief note on what was a complex case arising out of what, by any measure, appears to have been a very poor construction and subsequent maintenance of a new build block of flats. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
Hunt & Ors v Optima (Cambridge) Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 681 (TCC)This is a brief note on what was a complex case arising out of what, by any measure, appears to have been a very poor construction and subsequent maintenance of a new build block of flats. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 8:34 am by S
Nor does it appear that Aikenhead J was referred to either Wallace v Manchester CC (1998) 30 HLR 1111, English Churches Housing Group v Shine [2004] HLR 42 or Earle v Charalambous [2007] HLR 8. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 7:33 am by Giles Peaker
I’m not entirely sure on what basis the difference with leasehold cases like Earle v Charalambous (our note) is made out. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:18 am by Giles Peaker
Deposits taken pre 6 April 2007 and tenancy became statutory periodic before 6 April 2007 The Court of Appeal, in Charalambous v Ng, [our note] had found that while deposits taken before 2007, where the tenancy had also become a statutory periodic before 6 April 2007, did not have to be protected, no s.21 notice could be served until the deposit was protected or returned. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 1:31 pm by Giles Peaker
My view is that it should be as a percentage of the assessed open market rental value, as per Earle v Charalambous [2006] EWCA Civ 1090 . [read post]